中文
Stockinsky

China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited (CSSC) (600150) · A-shares · Shipbuilding and Marine Engineering Equipment Manufacturing

Report date: 2026-09-13 | Price data: As of the September 11, 2026 close; recent daily candlestick indicators use unadjusted data, while 52-week highs and lows use forward-adjusted data, so the methodologies may differ | Sources: 27 | Report engine: v1 (v2 available)
Report engine upgraded to v2 (2026-09-24)

This report was generated by engine v1. v2: Rebuilt like a professional research note: a conclusion-first summary with where the evidence differs from market expectations, a dated catalyst calendar, a watch list you can track, and a one-week price range based on historical volatility, all in a tighter write-up. What's new

View PDF Download Word Download Markdown

Price history

Loading price history...

Latest market data

Close39.1 (+0.39% on the day; -2.54% over 5 sessions; +13.56% over 20 sessions)
Market capCNY 294.25 billion
P/E (TTM)20.98x (1th percentile over 5.2 years)
P/B (MRQ)1.93x (27th percentile over 5.2 years)
P/S (TTM)1.72x (28th percentile over 5.2 years)
52-week range29.64 (2026-03-27) – 43.06 (2026-04-30)
Moving averagesMA5 38.56 / MA10 39.02 / MA20 38.53 / MA60 35.54
MACD (12,26,9)DIF 0.94, DEA 1.111, histogram -0.342
RSIRSI6 54.7 / RSI14 57.4
Bollinger bands (20,2)Upper 42.07 / middle 38.53 / lower 34.99
Volume0.64x the 20-day average
One-week range (about 68% coverage)37.14 – 41.21 (-5.0% ~ +5.4%)
One-week range (about 95% coverage)35.14 – 45.6 (-10.1% ~ +16.6%)

As of the 2026-09-30 close; calculated from daily price data (adjusted prices) and refreshed automatically each trading day. The one-week range reflects historical volatility only and is not a forecast. The report below was written on 2026-09-13; its prices and short-term scenarios reflect data at that time.

China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited (CSSC) (600150)

Equity Research Report | Industry: Shipbuilding and Offshore Engineering Equipment Manufacturing | Report date: September 13, 2026 | As of the September 11, 2026 close; recent daily K-line indicators use an unadjusted basis, while 52-week highs and lows use a forward-adjusted basis, so the two may differ in statistical basis

This report was automatically compiled by AI based on publicly available information and is for reference only. It does not constitute investment advice.

1. Executive Summary

China State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited (CSSC) generated revenue of RMB 91.530 billion in the first half of 2026, up 26.01% year on year; net profit attributable to the parent was RMB 9.954 billion, up 163.51%, while non-recurring-adjusted net profit attributable to the parent was RMB 9.742 billion, up 237.03%. Gross margin increased to approximately 17.37%. Revenue from shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering was approximately RMB 81.525 billion, with a gross margin of approximately 17.21%, making it the primary source of earnings growth. As of the end of June 2026, the company had a backlog of 729 vessels, 93.89 million deadweight tonnes and approximately RMB 526.266 billion in value, providing support for future deliveries and revenue recognition. It should be noted that following the completion of the merger by absorption of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited in 2025, the basis of the consolidated financial statements changed, limiting the comparability of historical data.

Following the restructuring, the company formed an integrated platform covering naval vessels, mainstream commercial vessels, high-end liquefied-gas carriers, large cruise ships, ship repair, offshore engineering and marine equipment. Recently, it signed contracts for 12 21,700-TEU LNG dual-fuel container ships and 10 8,200-vehicle LNG dual-fuel car carriers, with contract values of USD 2.688 billion and more than USD 1 billion, respectively. Delivery is mainly scheduled between 2028 and 2031, highlighting the company’s high-value-added and green-vessel order reserves. However, contract profitability will still depend on steel and equipment costs, exchange rates, delivery schedules and changes in the shipping market.

The improvement in profitability was mainly attributable to a higher proportion of mid- to high-end vessel types, higher prices per vessel, batch production of core vessel types, shorter construction cycles and cost controls. The gross margin of the principal business was 12.27% in 2025 and increased further to approximately 17.37% in the first half of 2026. During the same period, net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 10.918 billion, improving from a net outflow in the same period of the previous year. Nevertheless, the company remains subject to a manufacturing model characterized by a high proportion of raw materials and externally purchased equipment in costs, while rapid order growth coexists with supply-chain prepayments and capital tied up in vessels under construction.

As of the September 11, 2026 close, the company’s share price was RMB 39.75, above the MA5, MA10 and MA20, while MACD was above the zero axis, indicating a relatively strong technical trend. However, RSI6, RSI12 and KDJ were all at high levels, and the share price was approaching the upper Bollinger Band of RMB 40.52. In addition, net main-fund outflows were approximately RMB 481 million that day, indicating a combination of short-term strength and elevated volatility. On the same day, the company disclosed a fire accident involving a cargo vessel undergoing maintenance at Beihai Shipyard. None of the 25 missing persons showed signs of life. Property losses, the scope of the work stoppage, liability determination, insurance compensation and the impact on annual results have not yet been quantified.

2. Company Overview

2.1 Basic Information

ItemDetails
A-share code600150
Actual controllerChina State Shipbuilding Corporation Limited
IndustryCG37 Manufacture of railway, ship, aerospace and other transport equipment
Company positioningA core listed company focused on military and civilian businesses under China State Shipbuilding Corporation, covering naval and commercial vessels, ship repair, offshore engineering and marine equipment
RestructuringCompleted the share-swap merger by absorption of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited in September 2025; China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was included in CSSC’s consolidated statements from the third quarter of 2025
Basis of presentationOperating scale, revenue, orders and production capacity for 2025 include the relevant assets of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited and are not fully comparable with the original CSSC data for 2024
Data datePrimarily based on the 2025 annual report as of December 31, 2025; industry and restructuring information is as of the search date stated in the source notes

2.2 Principal Businesses and Product Portfolio

  • Shipbuilding: naval vessels, naval auxiliary vessels, government vessels, research vessels, as well as commercial vessels including container ships, oil tankers, bulk carriers, LNG carriers, LPG carriers, ethane carriers, car carriers, large cruise ships and ro-ro passenger ships
  • Ship repair and ship conversion: covering bulk carriers, container ships, oil tankers, chemical tankers, roll-on/roll-off vessels, luxury cruise ships, FPSOs/FSOs and special-purpose vessels
  • Offshore engineering: including FPSOs, FSRUs, drilling platforms, offshore wind installation platforms, offshore engineering support vessels and deep-sea fish farms
  • Marine equipment and electromechanical equipment: including marine diesel-engine components, marine propellers, crankshafts and crank throws, marine valves, ballast-water treatment systems, clean-fuel supply systems, marine coatings, marine turbochargers, intelligent equipment, railway vehicles and other engineering equipment
  • Following the 2025 restructuring, the company formed an industrial footprint comprising “seven major shipbuilding enterprises plus multiple marine-equipment companies.” The seven major shipbuilding enterprises are Jiangnan Shipyard, Dalian Shipbuilding, Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding, Guangzhou Shipyard International, Wuchang Shipbuilding, CSSC Chengxi Shipyard and Beihai Shipbuilding
  • Principal-business revenue was RMB 149.896 billion in 2025, with a gross margin of 12.27%. Shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering generated RMB 131.279 billion, accounting for approximately 87.6% of principal-business revenue, with a gross margin of 11.72%. Marine equipment, electromechanical equipment and other businesses generated RMB 18.617 billion, accounting for approximately 12.4%, with a gross margin of 16.15%
  • Revenue was RMB 151.978 billion in 2025, up 13.97% year on year; net profit attributable to shareholders of the listed company was RMB 7.848 billion, up 86.00%. As China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was included in the consolidated statements from the third quarter of 2025, 2025 and 2024 cannot be compared on a fully like-for-like basis

2.3 Position in the Upstream and Downstream Value Chain and Cost-Profit Structure

CSSC occupies the core midstream position in shipbuilding—final assembly and construction, and systems integration—and extends upstream and downstream through ship design, military-industry research and development, ship repair and conversion, and marine equipment. The company is not a resource-based upstream business with high margins. Its profitability primarily depends on order prices, vessel mix, steel and marine-equipment costs, delivery efficiency, supply-chain coordination and scaled manufacturing capabilities.

  • Major purchases include marine steel products such as heavy and medium plates, sections, non-ferrous metals, welding materials, coatings, castings and forgings, as well as other raw materials.
  • Major externally purchased items include marine main engines, auxiliary engines, engine components, electrical equipment, navigation and communications equipment, deck machinery, cargo-containment-system equipment for liquefied-gas carriers, environmental-protection equipment and clean-fuel systems.
  • Other inputs include labor, manufacturing expenses such as shipyards and plant facilities, and specialized expenses for welding, block manufacturing, final assembly, commissioning, sea trials and quality assurance.
  • In 2025, raw materials and externally purchased equipment totaled RMB 83.492 billion in industrial-business costs, accounting for approximately 64.30%; labor expenses were RMB 20.482 billion, or 15.78%; manufacturing expenses and other costs were RMB 25.859 billion, or 19.92%.
  • Purchases from the five largest suppliers totaled RMB 62.939 billion in 2025, accounting for 47.37% of total annual purchases; purchases from related parties totaled RMB 56.450 billion, accounting for 42.49%. Supplier concentration is relatively high, although a considerable portion comes from suppliers within the CSSC group. The specific concentration data are from the 2025 annual report and are consolidated under the same-control basis for the group.
  • The company is closer to a price taker for steel, certain general-purpose equipment and bulk raw materials, and cannot fully pass short-term cost fluctuations on to shipowners. For high-tech products such as large liquefied-gas carriers, green-fuel vessels, large cruise ships and naval vessels, the company has relatively stronger product pricing power based on its design, certification, process and brand capabilities.
  • Downstream customers include international and domestic shipping companies; large energy, oil, gas and trading companies; car-carrier and ro-ro transportation companies; domestic military and government-vessel procurement departments; coast guard equipment procurement departments; offshore engineering and offshore-energy customers; as well as ship-leasing companies, ship traders and large state-owned shipping groups.
  • Sales to the five largest customers totaled RMB 53.801 billion in 2025, accounting for 35.40% of total annual sales; sales to related parties totaled RMB 10.721 billion, accounting for 7.05%. The company disclosed that no single customer accounted for more than 50% of sales and that it did not consider itself heavily dependent on a small number of customers.
  • The five largest customers accounted for 42.56% of sales in 2024, declining to 35.40% in 2025. However, China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was consolidated in 2025, changing the annual reporting basis and limiting historical comparability. The above customer-concentration data are from the 2025 annual report and consolidate CSSC and its controlled subsidiaries under the same-control basis, meaning they are not fully equivalent to concentration among external independent customers.
  • Shipowners typically compare prices among shipyards globally, and competition is relatively intense for mainstream vessel types. Shipyards have relatively limited bargaining power for mature mainstream vessel types. Shipyards generally use staged payments at signing, commencement, keel laying, launching and delivery. Vessel prices are mostly fixed at signing, while steel, equipment, labor and exchange rates may change during construction, leaving shipyards exposed to some cost volatility.
  • For high-tech products such as LNG carriers, large cruise ships, dual-fuel vessels, special-purpose vessels and naval vessels, limited supply capacity gives shipyards relatively stronger bargaining power. Pricing and delivery capacity for ship repair and green conversion depend more on shipyard location, dock capacity, technical services and customer relationships.
  • At the end of 2025, net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 7.767 billion, down year on year, mainly due to the rapid ramp-up of production for orders on hand, increased investment in products under construction and higher cash paid for goods purchased and services received. Prepayments included substantial advances to supply-chain companies such as CSSC Materials and China Shipbuilding Industry Group Power, reflecting the need to secure main engines, power systems, steel and other key equipment in advance during the order-expansion period. Working capital is characterized by the coexistence of customer prepayments or contract liabilities, supply-chain prepayments and capital tied up in vessels under construction. The source notes do not provide specific data on accounts-receivable balances, days sales outstanding, or accounts receivable relative to revenue and net profit, so customer payment bargaining power cannot be further quantified.
  • Concentration data are all based on the 2025 annual report: the five largest suppliers accounted for 47.37% of purchases, while the five largest customers accounted for 35.40% of sales. Related-party purchases accounted for 42.49% of supplier purchases, and related-party sales accounted for 7.05% of customer sales. CSSC and its controlled subsidiaries are consolidated under the same-control basis, and China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was included in 2025. The data are therefore not fully comparable with 2024 and do not fully represent concentration among external independent suppliers and customers.
YearGross marginNet marginBrief description
2022Principal-business gross margin of 7.27%Net margin not provided in the source notesGross margin for shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering was approximately 5.91%. Profitability was pressured by higher prices for marine supporting equipment, increased logistics costs, shortages of key components and impairment of loss-making orders.
2023Principal-business gross margin of approximately 10.13%Net margin not provided in the source notesNewbuilding prices rose continuously, while the number of vessels delivered and average price per vessel increased. Expected profitability of orders on hand improved and loss-making orders declined. Disposal of the Waigaoqiao offshore engineering platform and other items had a significant non-recurring impact on profit; principal-business gross profit should be distinguished from one-off gains.
2024Principal-business gross margin of 9.94%; shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering gross margin of 9.57%Net margin not provided in the source notesNewbuilding prices continued to rise, while delivery volume and average price per vessel increased. Steel prices declined relatively, and smart manufacturing and lean management improved production efficiency. However, higher costs for externally purchased equipment partly offset the benefit of lower steel costs.
2025Principal-business gross margin of 12.27%; shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering gross margin of 11.72%; marine equipment, electromechanical equipment and other businesses gross margin of 16.15%Net margin not provided in the source notesA higher proportion of mid- to high-end vessel types, higher average prices per vessel, batch production of core vessel types, shorter construction cycles and improved cost controls drove the increase in gross margin. However, China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was included in the consolidated statements from the third quarter of 2025, so the data cannot be compared with 2024 on a fully like-for-like basis.

The company occupies the core midstream position in final ship assembly and systems integration. Overall, it is a midstream processing and manufacturing business and an integrated ship-and-marine equipment platform, rather than an upstream resource-based or downstream brand-oriented high-margin business. Future profit improvement will mainly depend on a higher proportion of high-end and green vessel types, sustained high newbuilding prices, control of steel and externally purchased equipment costs, batch and takt-based production of core vessel types, procurement, R&D and production synergies after the restructuring, and a higher contribution from ship repair, conversion and marine equipment.

3. Financial Data and Valuation Analysis

3.1 Recent Operating Performance

Reporting periodRevenueYoYNet profit attributable to parentYoY
First half of 2026RMB 91.530 billionUp 26.01% year on yearRMB 9.954 billionUp 163.51% year on year
First quarter of 2026RMB 43.312 billionUp 54.90% year on yearRMB 4.832 billionUp 251.64% year on year
Second quarter of 2026 (estimated from half-year data)Approximately RMB 48.218 billionNot providedApproximately RMB 5.121 billionNot provided
Full-year 2025RMB 151.978 billionUp 13.97% year on yearRMB 7.848 billionUp 86.00% year on year

As of August 31, 2026, the 2026 interim report was the latest formally available financial report, but it had not been audited. In the first half of 2026, non-recurring-adjusted net profit attributable to the parent was RMB 9.742 billion, up 237.03% year on year; basic EPS was RMB 1.323; gross margin was approximately 17.37%; net margin was approximately 11.66%; weighted-average return on equity was 6.71%; net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 10.918 billion, compared with a net outflow of RMB 2.801 billion in the same period of the previous year; and the debt-to-asset ratio was 62.41%. In 2025, non-recurring-adjusted net profit attributable to the parent was RMB 6.126 billion, up 99.42% year on year; basic EPS was RMB 1.24; gross margin was 12.58%; net margin was 6.92%; weighted-average return on equity was 7.36%; and net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 7.767 billion, down 47.26% year on year.

In the first half of 2026, revenue from shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering was approximately RMB 81.525 billion, up 30.39% year on year, with a gross margin of approximately 17.21%, making it the primary source of revenue and profit growth. During the same period, the company secured orders for 177 commercial and offshore engineering vessels, totaling 22.45 million deadweight tonnes and approximately RMB 119.386 billion in value. As of June 30, 2026, its backlog was 729 vessels, 93.89 million deadweight tonnes and approximately RMB 526.266 billion in value. Order value is not equivalent to future revenue or net profit, which will ultimately depend on delivery schedules, cost controls and changes in vessel prices. Data for 2025 and 2026 were affected by changes in the consolidated reporting basis following the merger by absorption of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited. Historical comparisons should prioritize the adjusted comparable data disclosed in the company’s annual reports.

3.2 Earnings Forecasts

The above ranges were compiled from forecasts disclosed by Huatai Securities, Soochow Securities, Zheshang Securities, China Merchants Securities and GF Securities between September 3 and September 9, 2026. They do not represent formal market consensus estimates on a uniform basis. Some institutions did not publish complete revenue, net profit attributable to the parent and EPS data simultaneously, so the figures cannot be regarded as a strict arithmetic average of multiple institutions.

YearRevenueNet profit attributable to parentNet profit growthEPS
2026Approximately RMB 182.1 billion–RMB 188.7 billionApproximately RMB 19.5 billion–RMB 20.8 billionNo unified forecast growth rate providedApproximately RMB 2.59–RMB 2.75
2027Approximately RMB 195.2 billion–RMB 218.9 billionApproximately RMB 25.7 billion–RMB 28.4 billionNo unified forecast growth rate providedApproximately RMB 3.42–RMB 3.78
2028Approximately RMB 211.1 billion–RMB 242.8 billionApproximately RMB 31.3 billion–RMB 36.0 billionNo unified forecast growth rate providedApproximately RMB 4.15–RMB 4.78

3.3 Valuation and Institutional Ratings

InstitutionRatingDateRemarks
Huatai SecuritiesBuySeptember 3 and September 9, 20262026 net profit attributable to the parent estimated at approximately RMB 20.088 billion, with EPS of approximately RMB 2.67. Net profit attributable to the parent for 2027–2028 estimated at approximately RMB 27.404 billion and RMB 35.976 billion, with EPS of approximately RMB 3.64 and RMB 4.78. A target price of RMB 48.06 is calculated using 18x 2026 PE.
Soochow SecuritiesBuySeptember 3, 2026Net profit attributable to the parent for 2026–2028 estimated at RMB 20.04 billion, RMB 25.71 billion and RMB 31.27 billion, respectively, with EPS of approximately RMB 2.66, RMB 3.42 and RMB 4.15, corresponding to forecast PEs of approximately 13x, 10x and 8x.
Zheshang SecuritiesBuySeptember 6, 2026Revenue for 2026–2028 estimated at approximately RMB 182.1 billion, RMB 195.2 billion and RMB 211.1 billion, respectively; net profit attributable to the parent estimated at approximately RMB 19.5 billion, RMB 26.2 billion and RMB 31.3 billion; EPS estimated at approximately RMB 2.59, RMB 3.49 and RMB 4.16, corresponding to PEs of approximately 14x, 11x and 9x.
China Merchants SecuritiesBuySeptember 3, 2026Net profit attributable to the parent for 2026–2027 estimated at approximately RMB 20.72 billion and RMB 28.44 billion, with EPS of approximately RMB 2.75 and RMB 3.78. 2028 EPS is estimated at approximately RMB 4.53.
GF SecuritiesBuySeptember 3, 2026Net profit attributable to the parent for 2026–2027 estimated at approximately RMB 20.22 billion and RMB 26.16 billion, with EPS of approximately RMB 2.69 and RMB 3.48. 2028 EPS is estimated at approximately RMB 4.52.
CICCOutperformSpecific date not providedTarget price of RMB 50.00, corresponding to approximately 18.1x its forecast 2026 PE.
Guotai HaitongBuySpecific date not providedTarget price of RMB 47.00, based on a 20x 2026 PE valuation.
Chengtong SecuritiesStrongly RecommendSpecific date not providedNet profit attributable to the parent for 2026–2028 forecast at approximately RMB 17.09 billion, RMB 23.92 billion and RMB 25.93 billion. No clear target price was provided in the summary.
Futu consensus (past three months)Strongly Recommend approximately 88.24%; Buy approximately 11.77%; Hold, Underperform and Sell all 0As of September 10, 2026A total of 17 analysts participated. Average target price was RMB 49.35, with a high of RMB 52.34 and a low of RMB 47.00.

As of the September 11, 2026 close, the share price was RMB 39.75, total market capitalization was approximately RMB 299.1 billion, net asset value per share was approximately RMB 32.06 and price-to-book ratio was approximately 1.96x. TTM PE was approximately 21.4x–21.9x, while non-recurring-adjusted TTM PE was approximately 20.68x as of September 10, 2026. Based on institutional EPS forecasts, forward PE was approximately 14.5x–15.3x for 2026, 10.5x–11.6x for 2027 and 8.3x–9.6x for 2028. Based on forecast 2026 net profit attributable to the parent of approximately RMB 19.5 billion–RMB 20.8 billion, the current market capitalization implies a PE of approximately 14.4x–15.3x. Based on forecast 2027 net profit attributable to the parent of approximately RMB 25.7 billion–RMB 28.4 billion, the implied PE is approximately 10.5x–11.6x. Comparing the closing price of RMB 39.75 with institutional target prices, the target-price range of RMB 47.00–RMB 52.34 implies potential upside of approximately 18%–32%. Current static or TTM valuation is not particularly low. However, because institutions expect rapid profit growth from 2026 to 2028, forward valuation is significantly below TTM valuation. The valuation assessment depends on successful delivery of high-priced orders, gross-margin expansion and sustained industry strength. The 2026 interim report is unaudited, and institutional forecasts differ. The cyclical nature of shipbuilding, raw-material prices, exchange rates, global trade frictions, shipping-market conditions and new-order trends may all affect earnings. PE and PB figures from different platforms may differ in profit definitions and update times and should be cross-checked against the closing price, the latest reported EPS and explicit calculation methodologies.

4. Recent News and Announcements

4.1 Cargo-Vessel Fire at Beihai Shipyard: None of the 25 Missing Persons Showed Signs of Life; Impact Not Yet Quantified

On September 11, 2026, CSSC disclosed that at approximately 11:15 a.m. on September 10, 2026, a fire broke out on a foreign-flagged cargo vessel while it was undergoing maintenance at the company’s controlled subsidiary, China State Shipbuilding Corporation Qingdao Beihai Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. As of the announcement, 12 people had safely evacuated, five had been injured and taken to hospital, and all 25 missing persons had been located but none showed signs of life. The Ministry of Emergency Management dispatched a working group to the site, while Shandong Province, Qingdao and CSSC organized resources for on-site response. The company stated that it would continue to monitor developments and fulfill its disclosure obligations in a timely manner. It has not disclosed specific property losses, insurance compensation, the scope of the work stoppage, liability determination or the quantified impact on annual results. Follow-up attention should focus on the accident investigation, resumption arrangements, compensation, insurance claims, vessel losses and potential contract-performance effects. Source: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12595872&stockid=600150

4.2 Contract for 12 Ultra-Large LNG Dual-Fuel Container Ships Signed, Valued at USD 2.688 Billion

On August 29, 2026, the company disclosed an announcement regarding a major contract signed by a subsidiary. Its wholly owned subsidiary Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co., Ltd., together with China Shipbuilding & Trading Co., Ltd., signed a newbuilding contract with COSCO Asset Management Co., Ltd. or its designated entity for 12 21,700-TEU LNG dual-fuel container ships. The total contract value is USD 2.688 billion. The contract was signed and became effective on August 28, 2026, with delivery expected between 2028 and 2030. Payment will be made in U.S. dollars, disputes will be resolved in Hong Kong and Hong Kong law will apply. The company stated that because of the long performance period, the contract would not have a material impact on current-period profit. If executed successfully, it will have a positive impact on future revenue and profit. Actual profitability will still depend on construction costs, steel prices, exchange rates, delivery schedules and shipping-market conditions. Source: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12567823&stockid=600150

4.3 Contract for 10 LNG Dual-Fuel Car Carriers Signed, Valued at More Than USD 1 Billion

On September 3, 2026, the company disclosed an announcement regarding a major contract signed by a subsidiary. Its controlled subsidiary Guangzhou Shipyard International Company Limited, together with China Shipbuilding & Trading Co., Ltd., signed a contract with a well-known shipowner on September 1, 2026, for 10 8,200-vehicle LNG dual-fuel car carriers. The total contract value exceeds USD 1 billion, with delivery expected between 2029 and 2031. The contract is denominated in U.S. dollars, governed by English law and subject to dispute resolution in London. The company stated that because of the long performance period, the contract would not have a material impact on current-period profit. Successful implementation would have a positive impact on future revenue and profit. The announcement did not disclose the specific name of the counterparty, leaving gaps in information regarding detailed commercial terms and the shipowner’s credit quality. Source: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12581370&stockid=600150

4.4 Arbitration Victory Expected to Increase 2026 Profit Before Tax by Approximately RMB 98.90 Million

On September 3, 2026, the company disclosed the result of arbitration involving a controlled subsidiary. Its wholly owned subsidiary Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. was the respondent in a dispute with ESSM1 LTD concerning a jack-up drilling platform. The original arbitration claim sought the return of a USD 18.10 million prepayment plus interest. The arbitral tribunal ultimately rejected all of the claimant’s requests, and the arbitration proceedings were terminated. Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding was not required to return the USD 18.10 million prepayment or interest. The company expects the arbitration result to increase 2026 profit before tax by approximately RMB 98.90 million. The final amount will be subject to the annual audit. Source: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12581369&stockid=600150

4.5 First-Half 2026 Net Profit Attributable to Parent of RMB 9.954 Billion; Interim Cash Dividend of Approximately RMB 3.499 Billion Proposed

On July 14, 2026, the company disclosed a preliminary earnings-growth announcement, expecting first-half 2026 net profit attributable to shareholders of the listed company to be RMB 9.2 billion–RMB 11.0 billion. This represented year-on-year growth of 212.29%–273.39% under the CSSC basis and 143.56%–191.21% under the restated basis following completion of the merger. Non-recurring-adjusted net profit was expected to be RMB 9.0 billion–RMB 10.8 billion. The interim report disclosed on August 31, 2026 showed first-half net profit attributable to the parent of RMB 9.954 billion, up 163.51% year on year and within the previously announced range. The company proposed a cash dividend of RMB 4.65 per 10 shares, representing total cash dividends of approximately RMB 3.499 billion, or 35.16% of first-half net profit attributable to the parent. As of the announcement date, no bonus shares or capitalization of capital reserves had been proposed. The record date and ex-dividend date had not yet been disclosed. The interim report was unaudited, and final data will be subject to the audit results. Sources: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12442205&stockid=600150; https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12574423&stockid=600150; https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12574424&stockid=600150

4.6 Chief Accountant Resigned Due to Work Reassignment; Director Resigned Due to Retirement

On August 4, 2026, the company announced that Chief Accountant Wang Jie had resigned from the position due to work reassignment, effective July 31, 2026. She would continue to serve as chief accountant of the wholly owned subsidiary Shanghai Waigaoqiao Shipbuilding Co., Ltd. The company stated that she had no disagreements with the board of directors and that her resignation would not affect the company’s standardized operations or normal business. A new chief accountant would be appointed as soon as possible. On August 7, 2026, the company announced that Director Zhang Jiande had resigned as director and as a member of the Nomination Committee and the Remuneration and Appraisal Committee due to retirement, effective August 5, 2026. The company stated that he had no outstanding public commitments, that his resignation did not result in the board falling below the statutory quorum, and that there were no disagreements between him and the company. A replacement director would be elected in accordance with regulations. Subsequent appointments to fill the chief accountant and director vacancies had not yet been disclosed. Sources: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12475226&stockid=600150; https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/view/vCB_AllBulletinDetail.php?id=12480508&stockid=600150

4.7 No New Announcements on Buybacks, Changes in Major Shareholdings or Material M&A and Restructuring Discovered Recently

As of September 12, 2026, searches of the company’s recent announcement list, relevant Shanghai Stock Exchange information and major announcement databases found no new share-repurchase plan or repurchase implementation announcement disclosed between July 2026 and September 12, 2026. No clear recent announcement of purchases or sales by the controlling shareholder, actual controller or shareholders holding more than 5% was found. The 2026 interim report showed “not applicable” for the repurchase account among the top 10 shareholders. No new material M&A, asset injection or restructuring announcement during September 2026 was found. The company’s previous merger by absorption of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited was completed in 2025. “Not found” does not mean that market transactions or non-announcement changes in shareholder holdings absolutely did not occur. The company’s announcements and relevant Shanghai Stock Exchange sections should continue to be monitored. Sources: https://money.finance.sina.com.cn/corp/go.php/vCB_AllBulletin/stockid/600150.phtml; https://q.stock.sohu.com/cn/600150/bw.shtml; https://www.sse.com.cn/

4.8 No New Public Announcements of Regulatory Penalties, Disciplinary Actions or Investigations Retrieved as of September 12

As of September 12, 2026, no new public regulatory penalty, disciplinary action or formal investigation announcement targeting CSSC or its major subsidiaries was retrieved. Recent relevant regulatory and policy information mainly involved continued strengthening of regulation concerning listed-company information disclosure, financial reporting and corporate governance, as well as industry trends related to green vessels, LNG dual-fuel vessels, car carriers and high-end container ships. No dedicated regulatory policy or targeted support document specifically concerning CSSC in September 2026 had been found. Recent order announcements highlighted risks related to the U.S. dollar exchange rate, changes in the shipping market and long contract-performance periods.

5. Share-Price Performance and Technical Analysis

5.1 Price Overview

IndicatorValue
Stock code/name600150.SH, CSSC
Closing priceRMB 39.75
Change/change percentage-RMB 1.07/-2.62%
Opening/high/lowRMB 39.50/RMB 40.00/RMB 38.90
Trading volume/value1.8328 million lots/RMB 7.248 billion
Turnover rate2.44%
Total/float market capitalizationApproximately RMB 299.143 billion/RMB 299.143 billion
Price-to-book ratioApproximately 1.96x
Dynamic PE/PE-TTMApproximately 15.03x/approximately 21.33x; the two use different statistical bases and should not be mixed
52-week high/lowRMB 42.94/RMB 29.67; high reached on April 30, 2026, and low on March 27, 2026
Current price positionApproximately 7.4% below the 52-week high and approximately 34.0% above the 52-week low; the closing price was above the closing prices on approximately 95% of trading days over the past year, placing it toward the upper end of the one-year price range
Year-to-date performanceUp approximately 20.86% since the beginning of 2026 on a forward-adjusted basis; year-to-date high of RMB 42.94 and low of RMB 29.67
Unadjusted range over the most recent 20 trading daysHigh of RMB 41.18 and low of RMB 32.59

5.2 Technical Indicators

IndicatorValueBrief interpretation
MA5/MA10/MA20RMB 39.51/RMB 37.18/RMB 35.49The closing price was above all three moving averages, with MA5>MA10>MA20, indicating a strong moving-average structure. However, the share price was approximately 6.9% above MA10 and 12.0% above MA20, showing a clear short-term deviation from medium-term averages
MACD DIF/DEA/histogram1.44/0.76/1.37MACD was above the zero axis, DIF exceeded DEA and the histogram was positive, indicating that the trend remained bullish
RSI6/RSI12/RSI2473.5/72.3/64.5RSI6 and RSI12 were above 70, indicating strong short-term momentum alongside some overbought characteristics. RSI24 remained in a relatively strong range
Bollinger upper/middle/lower bandsRMB 40.52/RMB 35.49/RMB 30.46The share price was between the middle and upper bands, approximately RMB 0.77 below the upper band. Around RMB 40.52 constitutes an important short-term resistance area
KDJ K/D/J87.0/84.3/92.4KDJ was in a high range, indicating strong short-term momentum but increased volatility risk after chasing prices at elevated levels
Recent price-volume relationshipSeptember 4: up 9.18%, turnover RMB 12.393 billion; September 11: down 2.62%, turnover RMB 7.248 billionThe September 4 rise was accompanied by a significant increase in volume, after which the share price continued higher. The September 11 pullback from elevated levels and net main-fund outflows indicated profit-taking pressure
Main fundsNet outflow of approximately RMB 481 million on September 11; cumulative net inflow of approximately RMB 875 million over the past 10 trading daysCumulative funds remained in net inflow over the past 10 days, primarily driven by the large inflow on September 4. Single-day main-fund data are more suitable for observing trading structure and cannot be directly equated with changes in institutional holdings

As of the September 11, 2026 close, CSSC traded at RMB 39.75, still above the MA5, MA10 and MA20. The moving averages were in a bullish arrangement, and MACD remained above the zero axis, indicating an overall strong technical trend. At the same time, RSI6, RSI12 and KDJ were all at high levels, the share price was approaching the upper Bollinger Band of RMB 40.52, and the stock pulled back from elevated levels with net main-fund outflows of approximately RMB 481 million. This indicated a coexistence of short-term strength and elevated volatility risk. Key areas to monitor are the RMB 39.00–RMB 39.60 support zone and the RMB 40.50–RMB 41.20 resistance zone.

5.3 Short-Term Outlook (Next Week; Scenario Analysis for Reference Only)

⚠️ Risk warning: The following content is a subjective scenario analysis based on the September 11, 2026 closing data, historical prices and technical indicators. It does not constitute investment advice or a single-point price forecast.

① Key Technical Levels

LevelRangeDescription
Short-term resistanceRMB 40.50–RMB 41.20Based on the upper Bollinger Band at RMB 40.52, recent highs and the intraday high of RMB 41.18 on September 10. A high-volume breakout above RMB 41.20 could open room toward the 52-week forward-adjusted high near RMB 42.94. Failure to break through after multiple tests would warrant attention to high-level consolidation or profit-taking
First supportRMB 39.00–RMB 39.60Based on MA5 at RMB 39.51, the September 11 low of RMB 38.90 and the recent closing-price range. Stabilization in this range could allow strong consolidation to continue. An effective closing-price break below RMB 39 could weaken the short-term bullish structure
Strong supportRMB 37.20–RMB 38.00Based on MA10 at RMB 37.18, the September 7 closing price of RMB 38.38 and the price-support area following the September 4 surge. An effective break below this range could lead to a further retracement toward MA20 near RMB 35.49 or the area around the starting point of the September 4 breakout

② Scenarios for the Coming Week (Subjective Weightings, Not Statistical Probabilities)

  • High-level consolidation (relatively high weighting, approximately 60%; a subjective heuristic judgment based on current technical indicators and fund flows, not a statistical probability): Price range of RMB 39.00–RMB 40.80. Trigger conditions are support above RMB 39, but an inability to break through the RMB 40.50–RMB 41.20 resistance zone, with turnover falling to approximately RMB 4 billion–RMB 7 billion and main-fund flows fluctuating.
  • Moderate downside (medium weighting; a subjective heuristic judgment, not a statistical probability): Price range of RMB 37.20–RMB 39.00. Trigger conditions are a break below RMB 39 without a rapid recovery, turnover expanding to above approximately RMB 8 billion–RMB 9 billion and continued net main-fund outflows, or a simultaneous correction in the shipbuilding and defense sectors. If RMB 37.20 also fails, the technical structure could shift from strong consolidation to a short-term correction.
  • Rebound and strengthening (low-to-medium weighting; a subjective heuristic judgment, not a statistical probability): Price range of RMB 40.50–RMB 42.90. Trigger conditions are a renewed close above RMB 40.50 and a high-volume breakout above RMB 41.20, with single-day turnover reaching or exceeding RMB 9 billion and main funds turning clearly into net inflows. A further breakout above RMB 42.94 would mean the price was approaching or exceeding the 52-week forward-adjusted high.

③ Fund-Flow and Liquidity Background

As of September 11, 2026, the turnover rate was 2.44% and turnover value was RMB 7.248 billion. Turnover over the past 10 trading days ranged from approximately RMB 2.417 billion to RMB 12.393 billion, with RMB 12.393 billion on September 4 representing an unusually high-volume day. Excluding that day, average daily turnover was approximately RMB 5.06 billion. Turnover of RMB 7.248 billion on September 11 was above the level of ordinary recent trading days but did not represent an extreme volume spike. Main funds recorded cumulative net inflows of approximately RMB 875 million over the past 10 trading days, but a single-day net outflow of approximately RMB 481 million on September 11, meaning fund flows were not one-way and consistently positive. The number of shareholders was approximately 613,900 as of June 30, 2026, down by 109,061 from March 31, 2026. This data is time-lagged and cannot directly represent the immediate shareholding structure on September 11, 2026. The top 10 tradable shareholders, based on the first-quarter 2026 report, held approximately 4.177 billion shares in total, or approximately 55.52% of tradable shares. They primarily comprised entities within the CSSC system, state-owned capital investment funds and state-owned industrial capital. Hong Kong Securities Clearing Company Limited held approximately 2.27%. No specific public-fund names appeared among the top 10 tradable shareholders for the period. This does not mean that public funds or other institutions had no holdings, and historical holdings of certain ETFs and other institutions cannot be assumed to have remained unchanged as of September 11, 2026. The above quarterly shareholder data may have changed, and the actual ownership structure should be based on subsequent disclosures.

A verifiable volume-confirmation signal would be a breakout attempt through the RMB 40.50–RMB 41.20 resistance zone accompanied by single-day turnover consistently reaching RMB 9 billion or more and main funds simultaneously shifting from net outflows to net inflows. This could be viewed as volume confirmation for an advance. If turnover remained below approximately RMB 5 billion during a rise, the move would more closely resemble a low-volume rebound or high-level consolidation, and the effectiveness of the breakout would require observation.

④ Key Points to Monitor (Observational Ideas Only, Not Trading Instructions)

  • Observe whether the RMB 39.00–RMB 39.60 area can provide short-term support; this is an observational idea, not a trading instruction.
  • Observe whether the RMB 40.50–RMB 41.20 resistance zone produces a high-volume breakout; this is an observational idea, not a trading instruction.
  • If the strong-support area of RMB 37.20–RMB 38.00 is breached, monitor support below near MA20 at approximately RMB 35.49; this is an observational idea, not a trading instruction.
  • Observe whether turnover can consistently reach RMB 9 billion or more during a breakout and coincide with net main-fund inflows; this is an observational idea, not a trading instruction.

The above scenario analysis is based on the September 11, 2026 closing data and calculations using historical prices and technical indicators. Short-term share prices may also be affected by news, fund flows, broader market conditions and other factors. Technical indicators themselves are lagging and limited, and the analysis does not guarantee actual future performance or constitute a buy or sell recommendation. Investors should independently assess the latest market information and bear their own investment risks.

6. Industry Landscape and Competitor Analysis

6.1 Industry Status

Global shipbuilding is highly concentrated in China, South Korea and Japan. In 2025, China’s ship completions, new orders and orders on hand totaled 53.69 million deadweight tonnes, 107.82 million deadweight tonnes and 274.42 million deadweight tonnes, respectively, accounting for 56.1%, 69.0% and 66.8% of global totals and maintaining China’s global leadership. Competition has shifted from simple low-cost competition toward comprehensive capabilities including large-dock and final-assembly capacity, design and construction of high-tech vessel types, green-fuel and low-carbon technologies, domestic marine-equipment production and supply-chain coordination, batch and intelligent production, global shipowner channels and financing, delivery cycles and after-sales service.

6.2 Competitive Landscape

  • China’s new ship orders declined 4.6% year on year in 2025, while orders on hand increased 31.5%, indicating short-term volatility in new orders but sufficient existing orders to support capacity utilization and future deliveries.
  • The domestic industry features competition among large central state-owned groups, local state-owned shipyards and private shipyards.
  • Following the restructuring with China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited, CSSC owns seven major shipbuilding enterprises and has broad coverage across military and commercial vessels, ship repair, offshore engineering and marine equipment, with clear product-range and scale advantages.
  • CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering mainly covers defense equipment, shipbuilding and offshore engineering, and emerging industries. It is competitive in southern China and defense equipment, but is smaller than CSSC overall and has a narrower product mix.
  • Yangzijiang Shipbuilding is a representative private commercial shipbuilder with strengths in batch production of commercial vessels, cost control, market-oriented customers and exports, but it does not possess military-industry assets on the same scale as CSSC.
  • South Korea’s HD Hyundai, HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore Engineering and Hanwha Ocean are highly competitive in large LNG carriers, ultra-large container ships, offshore engineering equipment and high-value-added vessel types.
  • Japanese shipbuilders retain technical expertise in bulk carriers, energy-efficient vessels, ship design and certain niche vessel types, but their overall order share and industrial scale are significantly below those of China and South Korea.

6.3 Major Competitors

CompanyPositioningDescription
CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering (600685)A-share/H-share-listed CSSC-group shipbuilding and defense-equipment companyStrengths include naval vessels, coast guard equipment, government vessels, feeder container ships, small and medium-sized gas carriers, dredgers and offshore engineering equipment. It belongs to the same CSSC group as CSSC and has overlapping products and customers, but CSSC has greater scale, broader vessel coverage and stronger large-vessel capabilities after the restructuring
Yangzijiang ShipbuildingSingapore-listed private commercial shipbuilderStrengths include batch production of commercial vessels, cost control, market-oriented customers and export capabilities. It is a suitable comparison for commercial-shipbuilding efficiency, delivery capabilities and operating mechanisms, but it does not include CSSC’s military businesses or large central state-owned enterprise resources
HD Hyundai Heavy Industries / HD Korea Shipbuilding & Offshore EngineeringLarge South Korean integrated shipbuilding and offshore engineering groupStrengths include large LNG carriers, ultra-large container ships, oil tankers, offshore engineering equipment and high-end ship design. It competes directly with CSSC in high-end commercial vessels and offshore engineering
Hanwha OceanLarge South Korean commercial, offshore engineering and defense shipbuilderStrengths include LNG carriers, offshore platforms, submarines and naval vessels. It competes strongly with CSSC internationally in LNG carriers, offshore engineering equipment and defense vessels
Major Japanese shipbuildersMature shipbuilding and ship-design companiesStrengths include energy-efficient vessels, bulk carriers, ship design, quality management and certain niche markets. Their overall scale and order shares are weaker than China’s, but they retain technical competitiveness in energy efficiency, design and certain vessel types

CSSC’s key differentiator is that, following the restructuring, it formed an integrated platform covering naval vessels, mainstream commercial vessels, high-end liquefied-gas carriers, large cruise ships, ship repair, offshore engineering and marine equipment. Its scale and product range clearly exceed those of most single shipyards. Compared with CSSC Offshore & Marine Engineering, CSSC is stronger in large vessels, product coverage and overall scale. Compared with Yangzijiang Shipbuilding, CSSC combines military-industry assets, central state-owned enterprise resources and integrated ship-and-marine equipment capabilities, although commercial-ship operating efficiency and profitability still need to be compared based on product mix. Compared with high-end South Korean shipbuilders, CSSC has advantages in scale, orders and supply-chain coordination, while Korean companies retain technical expertise in certain high-end gas carriers, offshore engineering and defense vessel types.

7. Risk Factors

  • The Beihai Shipyard cargo-vessel fire resulted in none of the 25 missing persons showing signs of life. As of now, the company has not disclosed specific property losses, insurance compensation, the scope of the work stoppage, liability determination or the quantified impact on annual results. The incident could subsequently affect production arrangements, contract performance and compensation expenses at the relevant facility.
  • The improvement in first-half 2026 earnings and gross margin was highly dependent on shipbuilding, ship repair and offshore engineering, as well as the delivery and realization of mid- to high-end vessel types and high-priced orders. If deliveries are delayed, construction efficiency declines or order costs rise, the value of orders on hand may not convert into revenue and profit as expected.
  • Raw materials and externally purchased equipment accounted for approximately 64.30% of industrial-business costs. Vessel prices are generally fixed at signing, while steel, main engines, auxiliary engines, navigation and communications equipment and other costs may fluctuate during construction. The company has limited short-term ability to pass through steel and certain general-purpose equipment costs, which may pressure gross margin.
  • The 12 LNG dual-fuel container ships and 10 LNG dual-fuel car carriers contracted in 2026 are both settled in U.S. dollars, with performance periods extending through 2030 and 2031, respectively. Exchange-rate fluctuations, shipowner credit quality, contract execution, delivery schedules and changes in international shipping markets may affect final profitability. The car-carrier contract did not disclose the specific counterparty, leaving gaps regarding the shipowner’s credit quality and commercial terms.
  • Rapid order growth will increase investment in products under construction, prepayments for key equipment and supply-chain capital requirements. Net cash flow from operating activities was RMB 7.767 billion in 2025 and declined year on year. Prepayments included substantial advances to supply-chain companies within the group. If production schedules, customer payments or supply-chain coordination fall short of expectations, working-capital pressure could increase.
  • Supplier concentration is relatively high. The five largest suppliers accounted for 47.37% of annual purchases in 2025, while related-party purchases accounted for 42.49%. Any delivery, quality or pricing problems involving key main engines, power systems, steel or other equipment could affect construction schedules for large vessels and high-tech vessel types.
  • Following the merger by absorption of China Shipbuilding Industry Company Limited in 2025, the latter was included in the consolidated statements from the third quarter of 2025. Data for 2025 and 2026 are not fully comparable with earlier years. The 2026 interim report is unaudited, and institutional earnings forecasts also differ significantly, creating risks related to the statistical basis and realization of historical growth rates and forward valuation.
  • As of September 11, 2026, the share price was RMB 39.75, only approximately 7.4% below the 52-week high. The price-to-book ratio was approximately 1.96x and PE-TTM approximately 21.33x. RSI and KDJ were also at high levels, with the share price close to the upper Bollinger Band. If earnings realization, order delivery or industry conditions fall short of expectations, valuation contraction and high-level volatility could follow.

8. Conclusion and Outlook

CSSC’s growth is primarily driven by the scale and industrial synergies created by the restructuring, a substantial order backlog, a higher proportion of high-end and green vessel types, and improvements in shipbuilding prices, batch production and operating efficiency. First-half 2026 earnings and cash flow both improved significantly. Recent contracts for LNG dual-fuel container ships and car carriers further strengthened medium- and long-term order reserves. Institutional forecasts for net profit attributable to the parent in 2026–2028 range from approximately RMB 19.5 billion to RMB 20.8 billion, RMB 25.7 billion to RMB 28.4 billion and RMB 31.3 billion to RMB 36.0 billion, respectively, although these forecasts are not unified consensus estimates.

Future earnings realization will still depend on whether high-priced orders are delivered as scheduled, construction costs remain controlled, gross margin is sustained and orders on hand are efficiently converted into revenue and profit. The company’s current TTM PE is approximately 21.33x, while institution-based 2026 forward PE is approximately 14.5x–15.3x, meaning valuation already relies to some extent on sustained profit growth and gross-margin expansion. The follow-up investigation and resumption arrangements relating to the Beihai Shipyard fire, the performance of U.S.-dollar contracts and exchange-rate movements will also affect operating results and market expectations.

Data Sources


This report was automatically retrieved, compiled and generated by AI based on publicly available information. Information is current as of the September 11, 2026 close; recent daily K-line indicators use an unadjusted basis, while 52-week highs and lows use a forward-adjusted basis, so the two may differ in statistical basis and timeliness. Specific data should be verified against the company’s formal announcements and authoritative data terminals. This report is for information organization and research reference only and does not constitute investment advice. Investors should make independent judgments and bear their own investment risks.

Reports are generated by AI from public online information and may contain errors or outdated information. They are for research only, not investment advice. Verify material facts against company filings and authoritative sources.