中文
Stockinsky

Valuation model library · Understand the method and its limits

38 models · Continuously expanding

Valuation models

A structured guide to 38 professional and classic valuation models: formulas, evidence, which companies each suits, key limitations and common misuse.

Start with suitabilityNo single model fits every stock
Separate evidence typesTheory, backtests and live results are not interchangeable
Reject false precisionScreening metrics are not disguised as price targets

Professional intrinsic value

Professional market pricing

Classic investor frameworks

Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium-high

Duan cash-flow valuation

Treats investing as buying a company's lifetime net cash flows while minimizing parameters and emphasizing business understanding, opportunity cost and a wide margin of safety.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

Buffett owner earnings

Uses cash owners can take out without harming long-term competitiveness instead of mechanical accounting earnings, then values its compounding potential.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Greenwald EPV

Capitalizes sustainable current after-tax operating earnings without paying for unproven growth, providing a conservative anchor beyond DCF.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Market expectations · Implementation difficulty: Medium-high

Reverse DCF

Works backward from the current price to infer the growth and margin expectations embedded by the market.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Asset value · Implementation difficulty: Low-medium

Graham NCAV

Subtracts all liabilities and senior claims from current assets to identify deep-value companies trading below conservative liquidation protection.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Lynch PEG

Compares P/E with sustainable earnings growth to impose simple price discipline on profitable growth companies.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Greenblatt Magic Formula

Ranks stocks by earnings yield and return on capital to find companies that are both inexpensive and capital-efficient.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

Life-cycle growth valuation

Lets growth, margins, reinvestment and risk converge as a company matures; useful when conventional multiples fail for growth companies.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Williams DDM

Defines equity value as the present value of all future shareholder distributions, a foundational cash-flow valuation framework.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low-medium

Piotroski F-Score

Uses nine public financial signals to separate improving low-valuation stocks from potential value traps.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Shareholder yield

Combines cash dividends and net buybacks to measure cash returned to continuing shareholders.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Return decomposition · Implementation difficulty: Low-medium

FCF yield plus growth

Adds current free-cash-flow yield to sustainable medium-term growth to decompose long-run return drivers.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

Gabelli PMV

Values the company or its segments from a strategic acquirer's perspective and looks for catalysts that close the public/private value gap.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Acquirer's Multiple

Divides enterprise value by normalized operating earnings to screen for inexpensive businesses from an acquirer's perspective.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Cycle context · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Shiller CAPE

Uses long-term inflation-adjusted average earnings to smooth cycles and assess market or sector valuation context.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Asset value · Implementation difficulty: Low-medium

Schloss asset discount

Emphasizes tangible assets, low debt and price discounts, using asset protection instead of optimistic distant-earnings forecasts.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Low

Graham Number

Takes the geometric mean of EPS and book value per share to produce a conservative price ceiling that folds in both earnings and assets, screening out clearly overpriced traditional value stocks.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Low

Gordon growth model

Assumes dividends grow at a single perpetual rate and capitalizes next year's dividend directly — the most transparent baseline form of dividend discount valuation.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium

H-Model

Within the dividend discount framework, assumes growth fades linearly from a high initial rate to a perpetual rate, approximating the two-stage model with a closed-form solution and avoiding valuation jumps from abrupt growth changes.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: Medium-high

Absolute P/E

Starts from a no-growth P/E, adds points for earnings growth and dividends to set a basic P/E, then adjusts for business risk, financial risk and earnings visibility, turning qualitative quality into an explainable fair P/E.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: Medium-high

Justified multiples

Algebraically rearranges the Gordon growth model to derive the P/E and P/B a company's fundamentals justify from its retention rate, ROE, growth and cost of equity, then multiplies by current fundamentals.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

EVA economic value added

Splits enterprise value into invested capital plus the present value of future economic profit (NOPAT minus a WACC-based capital charge); growth adds value only when returns exceed the cost of capital.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Altman Z-Score

Uses a weighted discriminant of five financial ratios to estimate the probability of financial distress within about two years, adding a bankruptcy-risk veto layer to deep-value conclusions.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Ohlson EBO

Makes the residual-income model explicit: equity value equals book value per share plus the present value of future excess returns (ROE minus cost of equity), decayed by a persistence factor.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: High

Beneish M-Score

An 8-variable discriminant built from two periods of financial line items, flagging abnormal changes in receivables, gross margin, asset quality, growth, depreciation, expense ratios, accruals and leverage to detect earnings-manipulation tendencies.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

APV

Splits enterprise value into unlevered operating value and financing side effects like the debt tax shield, priced separately — suited to companies whose leverage path will change materially, where a fixed-WACC assumption breaks down.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

CFROI

Reconstructs accounting returns into an inflation-adjusted internal rate of return, assumes it fades toward the economy-wide long-run average, and discounts the resulting economic profit to a warranted value — reducing distortion from depreciation policy and asset age.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: High

Real options

Prices pipeline assets, undeveloped reserves, or explicit expansion/abandonment options as call options via Black-Scholes, capturing unpriced optionality that a DCF would otherwise value at zero or negative.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Rule of 40

Treats revenue growth plus FCF margin summing to 40 as healthy growth, maps the degree of attainment to a suggested EV/Sales multiple band, and cross-checks with LTV/CAC and CAC payback period.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Cycle context · Implementation difficulty: Medium

Tobin's Q

Divides equity market value plus net debt by asset replacement cost to gauge the premium or discount the market assigns to a company's assets, mainly as cycle context for asset-heavy industries.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Neff total return ratio

Adds earnings growth rate and dividend yield, then divides by the P/E — a single number capturing cheapness, growth, and income together to find underpriced value stocks.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Sloan accruals anomaly

Measures how much of reported profit has not yet turned into real cash via (net income − operating cash flow) / total assets; a higher accrual ratio has historically predicted lower future returns.

View formulas, evidence and limits →
Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low

Novy-Marx gross profitability

Divides gross profit by total assets to gauge profitability quality; the ratio has historically correlated positively with future returns and hedges cheap stocks against being value traps.

View formulas, evidence and limits →

Valuation models organize facts and assumptions; they do not remove uncertainty. Content is for research and learning only, not investment advice.