Valuation models
A structured guide to 38 professional and classic valuation models: formulas, evidence, which companies each suits, key limitations and common misuse.
Professional intrinsic value
FCFF DCF
Discounts future cash flow available to all capital providers, providing a comprehensive bridge from operating forecasts to enterprise value.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highResidual income
Starts with current book equity and treats only earnings above the required return as added value; especially useful for banks, insurers and brokers.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highInsurance embedded value
Splits a life insurer into the value of policies already in force and the value of continuing to write new business; the standard way insurers are valued.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Asset value · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highNAV
Revalues assets and liabilities at realizable economic value rather than historical cost; suited to asset-driven businesses.
View formulas, evidence and limits →Professional market pricing
Classic investor frameworks
Duan cash-flow valuation
Treats investing as buying a company's lifetime net cash flows while minimizing parameters and emphasizing business understanding, opportunity cost and a wide margin of safety.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighBuffett owner earnings
Uses cash owners can take out without harming long-term competitiveness instead of mechanical accounting earnings, then values its compounding potential.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: MediumGreenwald EPV
Capitalizes sustainable current after-tax operating earnings without paying for unproven growth, providing a conservative anchor beyond DCF.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Market expectations · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highReverse DCF
Works backward from the current price to infer the growth and margin expectations embedded by the market.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Asset value · Implementation difficulty: Low-mediumGraham NCAV
Subtracts all liabilities and senior claims from current assets to identify deep-value companies trading below conservative liquidation protection.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: LowLynch PEG
Compares P/E with sustainable earnings growth to impose simple price discipline on profitable growth companies.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: MediumGreenblatt Magic Formula
Ranks stocks by earnings yield and return on capital to find companies that are both inexpensive and capital-efficient.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighLife-cycle growth valuation
Lets growth, margins, reinvestment and risk converge as a company matures; useful when conventional multiples fail for growth companies.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: MediumWilliams DDM
Defines equity value as the present value of all future shareholder distributions, a foundational cash-flow valuation framework.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: Low-mediumPiotroski F-Score
Uses nine public financial signals to separate improving low-valuation stocks from potential value traps.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: LowShareholder yield
Combines cash dividends and net buybacks to measure cash returned to continuing shareholders.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Return decomposition · Implementation difficulty: Low-mediumFCF yield plus growth
Adds current free-cash-flow yield to sustainable medium-term growth to decompose long-run return drivers.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighGabelli PMV
Values the company or its segments from a strategic acquirer's perspective and looks for catalysts that close the public/private value gap.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: LowAcquirer's Multiple
Divides enterprise value by normalized operating earnings to screen for inexpensive businesses from an acquirer's perspective.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Cycle context · Implementation difficulty: MediumShiller CAPE
Uses long-term inflation-adjusted average earnings to smooth cycles and assess market or sector valuation context.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Asset value · Implementation difficulty: Low-mediumSchloss asset discount
Emphasizes tangible assets, low debt and price discounts, using asset protection instead of optimistic distant-earnings forecasts.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: LowGraham Number
Takes the geometric mean of EPS and book value per share to produce a conservative price ceiling that folds in both earnings and assets, screening out clearly overpriced traditional value stocks.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: LowGordon growth model
Assumes dividends grow at a single perpetual rate and capitalizes next year's dividend directly — the most transparent baseline form of dividend discount valuation.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: MediumH-Model
Within the dividend discount framework, assumes growth fades linearly from a high initial rate to a perpetual rate, approximating the two-stage model with a closed-form solution and avoiding valuation jumps from abrupt growth changes.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highAbsolute P/E
Starts from a no-growth P/E, adds points for earnings growth and dividends to set a basic P/E, then adjusts for business risk, financial risk and earnings visibility, turning qualitative quality into an explainable fair P/E.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Relative valuation · Implementation difficulty: Medium-highJustified multiples
Algebraically rearranges the Gordon growth model to derive the P/E and P/B a company's fundamentals justify from its retention rate, ROE, growth and cost of equity, then multiplies by current fundamentals.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighEVA economic value added
Splits enterprise value into invested capital plus the present value of future economic profit (NOPAT minus a WACC-based capital charge); growth adds value only when returns exceed the cost of capital.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: MediumAltman Z-Score
Uses a weighted discriminant of five financial ratios to estimate the probability of financial distress within about two years, adding a bankruptcy-risk veto layer to deep-value conclusions.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: MediumOhlson EBO
Makes the residual-income model explicit: equity value equals book value per share plus the present value of future excess returns (ROE minus cost of equity), decayed by a persistence factor.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: HighBeneish M-Score
An 8-variable discriminant built from two periods of financial line items, flagging abnormal changes in receivables, gross margin, asset quality, growth, depreciation, expense ratios, accruals and leverage to detect earnings-manipulation tendencies.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighAPV
Splits enterprise value into unlevered operating value and financing side effects like the debt tax shield, priced separately — suited to companies whose leverage path will change materially, where a fixed-WACC assumption breaks down.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighCFROI
Reconstructs accounting returns into an inflation-adjusted internal rate of return, assumes it fades toward the economy-wide long-run average, and discounts the resulting economic profit to a warranted value — reducing distortion from depreciation policy and asset age.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Intrinsic value · Implementation difficulty: HighReal options
Prices pipeline assets, undeveloped reserves, or explicit expansion/abandonment options as call options via Black-Scholes, capturing unpriced optionality that a DCF would otherwise value at zero or negative.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: MediumRule of 40
Treats revenue growth plus FCF margin summing to 40 as healthy growth, maps the degree of attainment to a suggested EV/Sales multiple band, and cross-checks with LTV/CAC and CAC payback period.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Cycle context · Implementation difficulty: MediumTobin's Q
Divides equity market value plus net debt by asset replacement cost to gauge the premium or discount the market assigns to a company's assets, mainly as cycle context for asset-heavy industries.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: LowNeff total return ratio
Adds earnings growth rate and dividend yield, then divides by the P/E — a single number capturing cheapness, growth, and income together to find underpriced value stocks.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: LowSloan accruals anomaly
Measures how much of reported profit has not yet turned into real cash via (net income − operating cash flow) / total assets; a higher accrual ratio has historically predicted lower future returns.
View formulas, evidence and limits → Screening and validation · Implementation difficulty: LowNovy-Marx gross profitability
Divides gross profit by total assets to gauge profitability quality; the ratio has historically correlated positively with future returns and hedges cheap stocks against being value traps.
View formulas, evidence and limits →Valuation models organize facts and assumptions; they do not remove uncertainty. Content is for research and learning only, not investment advice.